Infographics, how nice

Infographics, how niceEvery now and then, so-called innovations in social media need a ‘reality-check’ in the form of a hefty kick up the backside. Hyped infographics are a good example of such an innovation – especially because they don’t work as a replacement for press releases. Press releases are good at distributing news efficiently to a large group of journalists. And at present there is no alternative method equally good at serving this purpose.

I’m not saying that good infographics are not very welcome. I have seen them appearing in all sorts of newspapers and magazines since last century. They can display information clearly and attractively in a very inspired way. So long live the infographic. But let’s not pretend they were invented on Facebook. And let’s be very clear: infographics cannot replace all other forms of communication.
 
So why do some people -who should know better- lose their common sense when a new social media innovation emerges? This includes Todd, manager at an American PR agency, who likes replacing press releases with infographics. The infographic should actually kill the press release. Kill, kill, destroy! Only very naive questions can be asked under such conditions: if it’s such a fantastic idea, why aren’t we all reading about the fantastic results?
 
Is there a place for infographics when communicating with the press? Of course there is; it can complement a press release every now and then. To be a real help to journalists, it’s best to give them a spreadsheet with all the data, so their colleagues in the graphics department can work their magic producing an infographic that fits in with the publication’s styleguide.

 

One press release per week?

One press release per week?We have been negotiating with a potential new client since the beginning of the year. It’s a French-American company that is asking us to send out thirty press releases in the coming year, and also possibly try and set up two press interviews. They want to pay us handsomely for this. We don’t want anything to do with it.
 
Perhaps this isn’t very sensible of us and we should be a bit more opportunistic. Should we take the money and run? No, because this client would be gone again in a year anyway, dissatisfied and looking for a new PR agency. So we’re trying to convince them to have a different approach.
 
This is a company with a couple of thousand employees that had twenty press releases in Belgium last year, which unfortunately didn’t result in any articles. By changing to a new PR agency, and sending out even more press releases, they are counting on improvement. Smells like therapeutic persistence?
 
Specialists versus generalists
Any relatively unknown B2B company does indeed need a different approach. On one hand you have companies which want to keep specialising further and further. On the other hand you have journalists who are becoming generalists more and more. So everything starts with closing this knowledge gap. Only then can you start to suggest why your company is interesting, economically necessary and socially relevant. It goes without saying that you can’t do this with weekly press releases. You need a more organic approach.